Rugby Law Explained: Why Henry Pollock's Try Was Legitimate (2026)

Henry Pollock's try against Sale Sharks sparked a heated debate, but the match officials made the right call. Here's the breakdown.

In the 77th minute, Northampton Saints' Tommy Freeman kicked the ball diagonally in-field, and Pollock gathered it in stride, racing away for a try. The controversy arose from Freeman's position and actions. He was beyond the touchline, out of play, and his right foot was grounded when he kicked the ball with his left.

However, according to the World Rugby laws, the officials' decision was correct. Law 18.2.d states that if a player in touch kicks the ball without holding it, the ball is not considered in touch. Freeman never took possession of the ball, and Pollock was onside, comfortably behind him when the kick occurred.

The officials' interpretation of the law was crucial, ensuring a fair outcome. Despite the confusion, the match officials got it right, and Pollock's try stood. The Saints' victory over Sale was a testament to their skill and strategy, and Pollock's try was a highlight of the game.

Rugby Law Explained: Why Henry Pollock's Try Was Legitimate (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Mrs. Angelic Larkin

Last Updated:

Views: 5763

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mrs. Angelic Larkin

Birthday: 1992-06-28

Address: Apt. 413 8275 Mueller Overpass, South Magnolia, IA 99527-6023

Phone: +6824704719725

Job: District Real-Estate Facilitator

Hobby: Letterboxing, Vacation, Poi, Homebrewing, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Cabaret

Introduction: My name is Mrs. Angelic Larkin, I am a cute, charming, funny, determined, inexpensive, joyous, cheerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.